Closer-to-the metal integrations with providers is definitely a big headache. Solving that problem takes a bit longer because you need bank partnerships, in many cases have to pass compliance screens, etc. We're aiming to tackle the more tractable part first which is the developer experience

▲

koakuma-chan 8 hours ago | parent [-]

If you're trying to be like Vercel—it's a red flag for any reasonable person when you clearly spent more effort on your landing page than your actual product. What made Stripe so successful is that, I personally would not even attempt, like you said, "integrations with providers" "bank partnerships" "compliance screens" because that sounds basically impossible.

▲

harrisontelyan 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

we're lucky enough to have a founding designer who makes it look easy in about a week - we spent about a year on the product in silence.

▲

irisman 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"It's hard so you shouldn't try doing it"

thank you, very productive reply

▲

koakuma-chan 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not saying they shouldn't be doing that. It's actually the opposite—they got the VC money, they might as well do something actually useful with it.

	▲	agreeahmed 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's definitely the gameplan. We believe very sincerely that developers deserve more choice when it comes to payments than they currently have. It's a central reason why we started building this. It just takes longer to make progress on that problem because of all the institutions involved.