| ▲ | clickety_clack 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I know we can tell that a chemical does a particular thing in the body, but can we tell that it does not do anything other than that thing? The body is ridiculously complex, and as far as I know we don’t know how every part (or combination of parts) works. Edit: I mean in the theoretical “this targets the x receptor” kind of way, not in “we tested this and found no causal link” way. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | KittenInABox 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That's why I'm genuinely asking why this would be disappointing, like what was the evidence that this does affect Alzheimer's. You would expect by X does not affect Y by default, so clearly there had to be a theory why you'd spend 2 years on a study to rule it out. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||