| ▲ | ZeroConcerns 9 hours ago | |||||||
Yup, and with an equal amount of mindblowing-units-of-money spent, infrastructure projects all around me are still failing as well, or at least being modified (read: downsized), delayed and/or budget-inflated beyond recognition. So, what's the point here, exactly? "Only licensed engineers as codified by (local!) law are allowed to do projects?" Nah, can't be it, their track record still has too many failures, sometimes even spectacularly explosive and/or implosive ones. "Any public project should only follow Best Practices"? Sure... "And only make The People feel good"... Incoherent! Ehhm, so, yeah, maybe things are just complicated, and we should focus more on the amount of effort we're prepared to put in, the competency (c.q. pay grade) of the staff we're willing to assign, and exactly how long we're willing to wait prior to conceding defeat? | ||||||||
| ▲ | graemep 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
One of the problems is scale. Large scale systems tend to fail. large centralised and centrally managed systems with big budgets and large numbers of people who need to coordinate, lots of people with an interest in the project pushing and lobbying for different things. Multiple smaller systems is usually a better approach, where possible. Not possible for things like transport infrastructure, but often possible for software. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | sebastos 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Nailed it, but I fear this wisdom will be easily passed by by someone who doesn’t already intuit it from years of experience. Like the Island de la Muerta: wisdom that can only be found if you already know where it is. | ||||||||