This is great, the value is there. I work for a F100 company that is trying (and failing) to build this in house because every product manager fundamentally misunderstands that users just want a chat window for AI, not to make their own complicated agents. Your biggest competition in the enterprise space, Copilot, has terrible UI and we only put up with it because it has access to email, SharePoint and Teams.

▲

Weves 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Haha, yea we've seen that exact story many times! Dissatisfied with Copilot and building a (not great) internal solution that is missing polish + most of the "advanced" feature set.

▲

katzskat 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I immediately thought of Google's Agentspace when I saw this product. The value for me sits in its ability to do RAG via connectors.

	▲	Weves 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		RAG + connectors is a huge reason why people deploy Onyx (enterprise search roots means we do a pretty good job there). Also, open-source works really here, since connectors are a long-tail game. We've tried to make it easy to add connectors (a single python interface), and as a result over half of our connectors are contributed by the community. We expect that percentage to grow over time. This means that compared to something like Agentspace, we'll very likely be connected to all of the key tools at your company (and if we aren't, you can easily add an integration).