> less tools, better skills to apply those tools

All models have peaked (the velocity of progress is basically zero compared to previous years) -there are not going to be "better skills" (any time soon).

All these bubbled up corps(es) have to try to sell what they can, agent this, tool that, buzzword soup to keep the investors clueless one more year.

That’s one narrative.

It’s typical for the foundation to settle before building on top of it.

Additionally do agree there is immense commercial pressure.

I’m quite curious how it all shakes out across the majors. If the foundation is relatively similar then the differentiator (and what they can charge) will determine their returns on this investment.

As a user, I love the competition and the evolution.

As an investor, am curious how it shakes out.

I just know how you can spend anytime with Gemini 3 and say things have peaked and progress is zero.

Just totally absurd.

It is really the opposite, the models are getting so good I question why I am wasting my time reading stupid comments like this from people.