| ▲ | RobertDeNiro a day ago | |
Since its a tool itself, I dont see the benefit of relying on Anthropic for this. if anything it now becomes vendor lock in. | ||
| ▲ | michaelanckaert a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
Correct, I wouldn't use it myself as it's a trivial addition to your implementation. Personally I keep all my work in this space as provider agnostic as I can. When the bubble eventually pops there will be victims, and you don't want a stack that's hard coded to one of the casualties. | ||
| ▲ | BoorishBears a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
They can post-train the model on usage of their specific tool along with the specific prompt they're using. LLMs generalize obviously, but I also wouldn't be shocked if it performs better than a "normal" implementation. | ||