| ▲ | asadotzler an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
If that's the case, let it be a feature of image editing packages that can output formats that are for the web. It's a web standard we're talking about here, not a general-purpose image format, so asking browsers to carry that big code load seems unreasonable when existing formats do most of what we need and want for the web. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | crote an hour ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
People generally expect browsers to display general-purpose image formats. It's why they support formats like classical JPEG, instead of just GIF and PNG. Turns out people really like being able to just drag-and-drop an image from their camera into a website - being forced to re-encode first it isn't exactly popular. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||