| ▲ | blintz 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Since ML-KEM is supported by the NSA, it should be assumed to have a NSA-known backdoor that they want to be used as much as possible AES and RSA are also supported by the NSA, but that doesn’t mean they were backdoored. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | HelloNurse an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
AES and RSA had enough public scrutiny to make backdooring backdoors imprudent. The standardization of an obviously weaker option than more established ones is difficult to explain with security reasons, so the default assumption should be that there are insecurity reasons. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | zahllos 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
SHA-2 was designed by the NSA. Nobody is saying there is a backdoor. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||