if you actually read your parent comment: "typical web image quality"

Typical web image quality is like it is partly because of lack of support. It’s literally more difficult to show a static HDR photo than a whole video!

▲

zozbot234 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

PNG supports HDR with up to 16 bits per channel, see https://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/ and the cICP, mDCV and cLLI chunks.

	▲	lonjil 36 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		With incredibly bad compression ratios.

▲

mort96 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

HDR should not be "typical web" anything. It's insane that websites are allowed to override my system brightness setting through HDR media. There's so much stuff out there that literally hurts my eyes if I've set my brightness such that pure white (SDR FFFFFF) is a comfortable light level.

I want JXL in web browsers, but without HDR support.