[flagged]

@dang, can we establish a rule that NSA apologists should not be doxxing HN members for the sin of advocating against the NSA's preferred narratives and worldview?

Deliberate personal breaches of privacy against HN members as a response to the contents of their speech like this stifle free discourse to the highest degree possible and should be banned or at least harshly admonished, no?

▲

throw94901ap 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not really "doxing" when the public username they chose to use is their actual name, leading directly to their github profile, and their arguing that you always represent your employer, even if you "cloak" yourself in an alternate name.

Saying that it is a "breach of privacy" when the relevant details are being advertised by the person in question is silly.

▲

anonym29 3 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

throw49320a 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Pointing out that the above isn't "doxxing" isn't an "NSA preferred narrative".

Oh, by the way, since you keep calling for dad:

"Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data. "

▲

anonym29 3 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

throw49320a 3 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

anonym29 3 hours ago | parent [-]

What on earth are you talking about, did you have an LLM write this?

	▲	throw49320a 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm sure dang or tomhow can confirm.

▲

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]