> Generally, if they were worth fixing - they would have been fixed.

???

Basically any major software product accumulates a few issues over time. There's always a "we can fix that later" mindset and it all piles up. MacOS and Windows are both buggy messes. I think I speak for the vast majority of people when I say that I'd prefer they have a fix-it year and just get rid of all the issues instead of trying to rush new features out the door.

Maybe rushing out features is good for more money now, but someday there'll be a straw that breaks the camel's back and they'll need to devote a lot of time to fix things or their products will be so bad that people will move to other options.

▲

foxygen 12 hours ago | parent [-]

Oh boy, I’d trade one(or easily 2/3) major MacOs version for a year worth of bug fixes in a heartbeat.

▲

Barbing 11 hours ago | parent [-]

You got it per Gurman:

>For iOS 27 and next year’s other major operating system updates — including macOS 27 — the company is focused on improving the software’s quality and underlying performance.

-via Bloomberg today

	▲	baq 11 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I’ll believe it when I see it, but holy quality Batman I want to believe.
	▲	Lionga 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		how will the poor engineers get promotions if they can not write "Launch feature X" (broken, half baked) on their promotion requests? Nobody ever got promoted for fixing bugs or keeping software useable.