| ▲ | ISPs more likely to throttle netizens who connect through CG-NAT: Cloudflare(theregister.com) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 31 points by throw0101a 2 hours ago | 6 comments | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mcpherrinm an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
The Register is adding very little on top of https://blog.cloudflare.com/detecting-cgn-to-reduce-collater... Previously discussed (a bit) at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45746509 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | daft_pink 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
They need to come up with an ip solution that is useful enough that people actually want to upgrade to it. When you compare it to other technologies like https, tls1.3, unicode, 5g cellular, wifi 6, wifi 5 or bluetooth versions, etc. It’s clear that ipv6 adoption is not what it should be if they launched a protocol with clearer benefits to the end user. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lxgr 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
> Because CGNAT is more prominent, and more heavily used, in Africa and Asia […] Isn’t essentially the entire US on CG-NAT for IPv4 on mobile data? I’ve also had DOCSIS connections, i.e., fixed lines, with only CG-NAT in Europe years ago. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||