That has not been the case for quite a long time now. Lots of distros still have websites that look like a wiki, see Arch. But in their case the Arch wiki is one of the best wikis ever existed for what it covers.

If you look at modern yet established distros, I struggle to find the outliers that don't have professional looking, slick web pages. See all the *buntus, Fedora, Elementary OS, Cachy OS, Bazzite, Endeavour, Manjaro, Linux Mint, and so forth.

▲

odie5533 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I think the medium is the message here. When I see Arch's home page, I know it will be a hobby OS where there's countless hours of fun in terminal land editing config files. That's how I know it's not for me.

▲

oarsinsync 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Check out the Debian website. Slicker than it used to be. Still not slick.

	▲	oAlbe 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I mean, ignoring the fact that it's one example versus a list of examples I posted, I still don't think Debian website is that bad. I remember how it used to be, when it had a link to get the CDs with the distro and the option of getting all the packages in the package manager repository. Debian evolved like everybody else. To me, and of course this is personal, Debian website looks pretty professional in an enterprise-y kind of way. I quite like it. But then again, it's one example. Hell, even OpenSUSE's website looks super slick and modern.