| ▲ | Aurornis 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
“Just ban everything I don’t like as long as it won’t impact anything I do like” is a frequent take on HN these days. Then when states start doing things like adding ID requirements for websites it’s shock and rage as the consequences of banning things (even for under 18s) encounter the realities of what happens when you “just ban” things. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | terminalshort 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It really has turned into a bitter losers bitch fest in here. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | opan 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think we can separate the banning of things which affect personal freedom from the rest. Like if oil were "banned", I'm imagining it's not illegal to possess oil, but rather oil companies wouldn't be able to drill it up and sell it anymore. A bit like fazing out asbestos. The ordinary people with asbestos tiles in their basement don't get into trouble, but new house builds can't/won't use that tile anymore. ID requirements seem like the main burden is being put on ordinary people instead of corporations, and by extension seems clearly bad. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||