|
| ▲ | AngryData 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Its not like it is some monumental task. Fiber is cheaper than copper, and we managed to lay copper telephone lines and power lines to everybody. Where I live right now didn't even have DSL available at any point in time, the local telecomm didn't want to spend money on replacing some of the poorly functioning 60 year old copper lines despite everyone clamoring for any kind of wired connection. And yet a startup ISP managed to not only lay down gigabit direct to home fiber to the entire county in under 2 years, but they provide it for significantly cheaper than people's wireless/mobile internet. And they are still expanding across the entire state so are obviously earning money from it. Existing telecomms have zero excuses after being given billions of dollars to do this after seeing startup fiber companies manage to do it profitably after the fact in even in some of the lowest density areas east of the Mississippi. |
|
| ▲ | yxhuvud 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Once an area has its shit in order regulatory-wise: yes. Here my house org will upgrade from 1- to 10-gbit next month, mostly cause it also bumps the wifi generation to the latest and the cost difference was neglible. Previous hardware was end of life , so we had to change stuff regardless. |
|
| ▲ | ashirviskas 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Shut up, 1gbps up/down in 2025 should be a basic human right. I can't believe the things you learned to justify in US |
| |
| ▲ | koakuma-chan 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You are absolutely right. There should be zero tolerance towards ISPs that provide anything less than one gigabit per second. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | fsckboy 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| everybody has a fraction of that speed |