| ▲ | jameslk 3 hours ago | |||||||
It’s good that it’s a state policy, not a federal one. We need more policies to stay at the state level, regardless of the policy. Federalism is how we can test the effects of competing policies under the same house. If the policy is a problem for you, it’s a lot easier to vote with your feet and move to a different state than to move to a different country | ||||||||
| ▲ | paradox460 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Too many people aren't satisfied with the policies they want affecting only them and their communities. They want to impose their will on people thousands of miles away | ||||||||
| ▲ | sudobash1 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think it also gives it a better chance as an experiment. The federal government tends to pendulum swing between left and right on a fairly short cycle. Most states seem to be considerably more stable and less prone to trying to revert policies put in place by the "other side" every few years. | ||||||||
| ▲ | nkrisc 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
For some things, yes. I think this sort of thing is compatible with being legislated at the state level. Other policies are not. See states with strict gun laws being undermined by neighboring states with very loose laws. | ||||||||
| ||||||||