Remix.run Logo
Java Decompiler(java-decompiler.github.io)
65 points by mooreds 4 days ago | 23 comments
uneven9434 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

More modern choices are JADX (https://github.com/skylot/jadx) or Vineflower (https://github.com/Vineflower/vineflower). If you want a paid, higher-quality option, try JEB (https://www.pnfsoftware.com/).

drtse4 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sadly it's not maintained anymore and even the intellijidea-derived decompilers are better nowadays (used to be horrible until a few years ago).

In addition to the limitation to classfiles built for Java8, it sadly has a hard time decompiling new language features even if compiled for a Java8 target. And then there is the well known bug that decompiling full jars in bulk does not get you the same output you see in the UI but orders of magnitude worse... jd was great until it lasted, helped me solve a lot of issues with verdors over the years.

VonGuard 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think this is popping up in Hacker News because the concept of decompilers has become a bit more acceptable recently. (strokes beard)Time was, decompilation was said to be Impossible (as my wise friend syke said: most things people say are impossible are just tedious). Then, it just became "something you could only do in a targeted, single-application fashion.)

Somewhere in there, Alan Kaye laughed and handed everyone dynamic code.

These days, with AI in tow, decompilation is becoming the sort of thing that could be in the toolchain, replacing IDA and such. Why debug and examine when you can literally decompile?!

So, maybe, that idea being considered to be newly on the table, someone felt the need to post a counter-point, proving once again that everything old is new again.

Hats off for decomiling Java apps that mostly predate generics and annotations... both of which were added in 5.

branko_d an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Is there anything especially hard about decompiling (to) Java?

.NET/C# decompilers are widespread and generally work well (there is one built into Visual Studio nowdays, JetBrains have their own, there were a bunch of stand-alone tools too back in the the day).

leibnitz27 12 minutes ago | parent [-]

< disclaimer - I wrote CFR, which is one of the original set of 'modern' java decompilers >

Generic erasure is a giant pain in the rear. C# doesn't do this. You don't actually keep any information about generics in the bytecode, however some of the metadata is present. BUT IT COULD BE FULL OF LIES.

There's also a huge amount of syntactic sugar in later java versions - take for example switch expressions.

https://www.benf.org/other/cfr/switch_expressions.html

and OH MY GOD FINALLY

https://www.benf.org/other/cfr/finally.html

darkamaul 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

One of the use case of décompilation is bug hunting / vulnerability research. And that’s still one of the use cases where AI isn’t that good because you must be precise.

I’m not saying that won’t change but I still see a bright future for reversing tools, with or without AI sidekicks (like the BN plugin)

hhh an hour ago | parent [-]

I used codex 5.1 yesterday to point at a firmware blob and let it extract and explore it targeting a specific undisclosed vulnerability and it managed (after floundering for a bit) to read the Lua bytecode and identify and exploit the vuln on a device running the firmware.

Igor_Wiwi 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Or you can use https://jar.tools/ - online java decompiler I built some time ago. Runs in your browser

ur-whale 34 minutes ago | parent [-]

> Runs in your browser

You say it like it's a good thing.

Igor_Wiwi 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

yes, because you don't need to install anything on your machine

j16sdiz 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This one haven't been updated for 5 years and do not support any newer java features.

jbn 19 minutes ago | parent [-]

which new feature are not supported?

almosthere 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

next, add a feature that does a pass with an llm that makes local variable names more realistic and adds comments.

winrid 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Vineflower is probably what you want nowadays

mberning 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A great tool for digging into obscure jar and class files. I used it many times to track down very obscure bugs in Java based products. Often you will have a vendor saying that your issue is not real or not reproducible on their end. But with this kind of tool you can peek behind the curtains and figure out how to trigger some condition 100% of the time.

ternaryoperator 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It had better be really old Java code. This decompiler supports only through Java 8. We're on Java 24 now.

esafak 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Java 8 is your everyday corporate code ...

tombert 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Didn't Oracle drop support for Java 8 like six years ago? I'm sure there are plenty of companies still running it, but even Apple (a relatively conservative company in this regard) updated to Java 11 when I was there in ~2019.

drtse4 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Java SE subscribers will receive JDK 8 updates until at least December 2030

Not for clients with a commercial license, and there are many.

PrimeDirective 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

https://github.com/corretto/corretto-8/blob/develop/CHANGELO...

Amazon still supporting Java 8

heisenbit 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It used to but Oracle‘s licensing and probably more important security guidelines from the very top linking CVE scores to mandatory updates got things moving on the last years.

rileymichael 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

this isn't really the case. a lot of legacy code may still be running the version it was developed against, but java 17+ has a sizable share of the ecosystem now that all of the popular libraries require it. spring for example bumped their baseline to jdk 17 in 2022.

krzyk 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Nope, we are on Java 25