| ▲ | anthonylevine an hour ago | |||||||
No you can't. You can blame the endless amount of people that jump in these threads with hot takes about technologies they neither understand or have experience with. How many event sourced systems have you built? If the answer is 0, I'd have a real hard time understanding how you can even make that judgement. In fact, half of this thread can't even be bothered to look up the definition of CQRS, so the idea that "Storing facts" is to blame for people abusing it is a bit of a stretch, no? | ||||||||
| ▲ | simonw 30 minutes ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I've not run an event sourcing system in production myself. This thread appears to have stories from several people who have though, and have credible criticisms: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45962656#46014546 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45962656#46013851 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45962656#46014050 What's your response to the common theme that event sourcing systems are difficult to maintain in the face of constantly changing product requirements? | ||||||||
| ||||||||