To avoid arguments about the definition of "be", the clear conclusion is that if it exists it's indistinguishable prior to that age, so any claims before that age can only be considered noise.

It's critical to remember that "reality has a liberal bias" does not mean "literally every detail of things liberals say is reality".

▲

squigz 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> the clear conclusion is that if it exists it's indistinguishable prior to that age

How is that clear? How would we know if it's indistinguishable if your studies didn't even look?

	▲	o11c 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The whole point is that the studies explicitly did look, and found a negative result.