| ▲ | lagosfractal42 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GPUs have massive applications such as Alphafold, CRISPR, Medical Imaging, Meteorology. The massive planetary investment is not to make more AI chats that summarize text. That's just short sighted. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | counters 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Meteorology It seems like that at first glance. But in reality, GPUs have had extremely slow adoption for real-world operational meteorology applications. Because of the fundamental design and architecture of most NWP systems, it was very difficult to leverage GPUs as compute accelerators; most efforts barely eked out any performance gains once you account for host/device memory transfers. It really wasn't until some groups started to design new weather modeling systems from the ground up that they could architect things in such a way that GPUs made a significant difference. Obviously AI / ML weather modeling is a different story. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | munk-a 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As someone working in a field that has used NLP for quite some time - yeah, I generally agree that those investments are worth their weight in gold... which is unfortunate because before ChatGPT came along they were viewed as niche unprofitable money-sinks. The astronomical investments we've seen lately have been in general models which can be leveraged to outperform some of our older models but had we wanted purely to improve those models there were much more efficient ways to do so. Hopefully we can retain a lot of this value when the bubble bursts but I just haven't seen any really good success stories of converting these models into businesses. If you try and build as a middleman where you leverage a model to solve someone's problem they can always just go to the model runner and get the same results for cheaper - and the model runners seem (so far - this may change) to be unable to price model usage at a level that actually makes it sustainable. Those older models running specialized tasks seem to be trucking along just fine for now - but I remain concerned that when the bubble bursts it's going to starve these necessary investments of capital. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | KalMann 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You're missing the point. Those kind of narrow AI applications are not the motivation for the trillions of dollars being poured into AI. Of course AI has a variety of applications many disciplines, as it has for decades. The motivation behind the massive investment in AI is as forgetfulness said, reap the benefits from "revolutionizing the workplace" | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ares623 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That’s copium, as the kids say nowadays. The massive planetary investment is a 100% for AI chats. All those other things are taking the crumbs where they can. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hyperbovine 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eh, those applications (incl. protein folding) existed for a decade-plus before LLMs came onto the scene, and there was absolutely nothing like the scale of capex that we're seeing right now. It's like literally 100-1000x larger than what GPU hosting providers were spending previously. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||