> > SSRIs never help because of boosting serotonin.

> That's a hell of a claim, which could use some evidence.

My experience with the chatbots is that they start with the conventional marketing tropes, but if you ask pointed questions they'll dig into the actual research.

This thread started with a generic question about why ECT seemed to help some patients. It had a really good reasoning about why SSRIs are still the first-line treatment for depression, even though the MAOIs were much better drugs.

https://chatgpt.com/share/69207aa3-26a0-8005-8dda-8199da153f...

  The Big Picture

  SSRIs flood serotonin globally, which can suppress 
  dopamine/norepinephrine and blunt mood.
  
  Anti-serotonin strategies (receptor-specific antagonism, 
  reuptake enhancement, or targeted modulation) often 
  result in cleaner antidepressant effects with fewer 
  side effects.
  
  This supports the criticism you mentioned: SSRIs may 
  “work” only because the brain adapts to the serotonin 
  disruption, whereas directly reducing or modulating 
  serotonin is more therapeutic.

A simple pregnenolone supplement can sometimes be magical, because of the steroidogenesis cascade: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steroid#/media/File:Steroidoge...

There's a supplement seller that said his pregnenolone powder was made with a newer, cleaner process than is used by most of the pregnenolone supplement vendors, but I don't know if he's still using that supplier. The powders are a much better value than the capsules.

hth.

The chatbot is great as a first-line of research for many things, but something like this needs to be backed up by actual research to make a concrete claim. It will absolutely fabricate falsehoods or misrepresent truths based on an unknown number of stochastic factors behind any response. Shame on your for propagating a bunch of mumbo-jumbo that every reader must go verify for themselves if they want to substantiate or refute your claim - in response to a request for substantiation!