Well, seems in this case parent did know the answer, so I'm not sure what your point is.

I'm asking for the sake of reproducibility and to clarify if they used the text-by-chance generator more than once, to ensure they didn't just hit one out of ten bad cases since they only tested it once.

▲

latexr 10 hours ago | parent [-]

> so I'm not sure what your point is.

That your suggestion would not correspond to real use by real regular people. OP posted the message as noteworthy because they knew it was wrong. Anyone who didn’t and trusts LLMs blindly (which is not a small number) would’ve left it at that and gone about their day with wrong information.

	▲	embedding-shape 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> That your suggestion would not correspond to real use by real regular people. Which wasn't the point either, the point was just to ask "Did you run one prompt, or many times?" as that obviously impacts how seriously you can take whatever outcome you get.