| ▲ | bgwalter 14 hours ago | |||||||
There is no end result. It's a toy language based on a couple of examples without a grammar where apparently the LLM used its standard (plagiarized) parser/lexer code and reiterated until the examples passed. Automating one of the fun parts of CS is just weird. So with this awesome "productivity" we now can have 10,000 new toy languages per day on GitHub instead of just 100? | ||||||||
| ▲ | TeodorDyakov 14 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
That was exactly my thought. Why automate the coding part to create something that will be used for coding (and in itself can be automated , going buy the same logic)? This makes zero sense. | ||||||||
| ||||||||