thanks, I love your website. Are you planning to do NB Pro for the text-to-image benchmark too?

▲ vunderba 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Outside the time frame of being able to edit my original reply, but I've finally re-run the Text-to-Image portion of the site through NB Pro.

  Results

  gpt-image-1: 10 / 12 
  Nano Banana Pro: 9 / 12
  Nano Banana: 8 / 12

It's worth mentioning that even though it only scored slightly better than the original NB, many of the images are significantly better looking.

https://genai-showdown.specr.net?models=nb,nbp

	▲	Wyverald 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		thanks for the update. One small note: for the d20 test, NB Pro had duplications of 13 and 17 too, not just 19.

▲ vunderba 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Definitely! Even though NB's predominant use case seems to be editing, it's still producing surprisingly decent text-to-image results. Imagen4 currently still comes out ahead in terms of image fidelity, but I think NB Pro will close the gap even further.

I'll try to have the generative comparisons for NB Pro up later this afternoon once I catch my breath.