| ▲ | famouswaffles 10 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
It's an image. There's simply no way to add a watermark to an image that's both imperceptible to the user and non-trivial to remove. You'd have to pick one of those options. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fwip 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm not sure that's correct. I'm not an expert, but there's a lot of literature on digital watermarks that are robust to manipulation. It may be easier if you have an oracle on your end to say "yes, this image has/does not have the watermark," which could be the case for some proposed implementations of an AI watermark. (Often the use-case for digital watermarks assumes that the watermarker keeps the evaluation tool secret - this lets them find, e.g, people who leak early screenings of movies.) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aqme28 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
That is patently false. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||