Remix.run Logo
famouswaffles 10 hours ago

It's an image. There's simply no way to add a watermark to an image that's both imperceptible to the user and non-trivial to remove. You'd have to pick one of those options.

fwip 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not sure that's correct. I'm not an expert, but there's a lot of literature on digital watermarks that are robust to manipulation.

It may be easier if you have an oracle on your end to say "yes, this image has/does not have the watermark," which could be the case for some proposed implementations of an AI watermark. (Often the use-case for digital watermarks assumes that the watermarker keeps the evaluation tool secret - this lets them find, e.g, people who leak early screenings of movies.)

aqme28 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That is patently false.

flir 9 hours ago | parent [-]

So, uh... do you know of an implementation that has both those properties? I'd be quite interested in that.

viraptor 7 hours ago | parent [-]

https://arxiv.org/html/2502.10465v1