I'm not talking to them. I am responding to you - your sardonic piss-take is against HN guidelines and written in bad-faith.

▲

measurablefunc 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I recommend you move on & refrain from responding to any of my posts in the future. If you're so concerned about the guidelines then reach out to the moderators & make your case, otherwise, I further recommend you save yourself the keystrokes.

▲

bigyabai 34 minutes ago | parent [-]

Sure, and thieves probably recommend that the cops move on & refrain from following where they're headed.

Be honest and you won't have to fend-off accusations of bad-faith. I'm inclined to agree with your overall point of AI being overhyped, but you've gutted your own logic so hard in the process that your stance is unrecognizable. You've developed a meaningfully ambiguous stance to an elaborate and deeply incorrect series of arguments.

	▲	measurablefunc 8 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm going to add another point to my profile for cases like this because it doesn't seem like the two already there are sufficient. For future reference, the proper way to counter an argument is to present a convincing counter-argument instead of simply dismissing them as "deeply incorrect".