|
| ▲ | j16sdiz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I am not saying this is impossible, but I am down voting this because this is _not an interesting discussion_. The whole point of having an online discussion forum is to exchange and create new ideas. What you are advocating is essentially "maybe we can stop generating new ideas because we don't have to. we should just sit and wait"... Well, yes, no, maybe. but this is not what I expect to get from here. |
| |
| ▲ | measurablefunc 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can do whatever you want & I didn't ask you to participate in my thread so unless you are going to address the actual points I'm making instead of telling me it is not interesting then we don't have anything to discuss further. |
|
|
| ▲ | j16sdiz 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So, your strategy for solving this is: Convert it to another harder problem (AGI). Now it is somebody else (AI researcher)'s problem. This is outsourcing the task to AI researchers. |
| |
| ▲ | measurablefunc 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | They keep promising that this kind of capability is right around the corner & they keep showing how awesome they are at passing math exams so why is this a more difficult problem than solving problems in abstract algebra & scheme theory on humanity's last exam or whatever is the latest & greatest benchmark for mathematical capabilities? |
|
|
| ▲ | nutjob2 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Isn't AGI around the corner? There isn't even a concrete definition of intelligence, let alone AGI, so no it's not. That's just mindless hype at this point. |
| |
| ▲ | measurablefunc 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Are you trying to say that Sam Altman & Elon Musk have been less than honest about their prognosis of luxurious & automated future utopias? |
|
