What lunatic thinks that voice is the best way to interface with a computer?

Did pewdiepie not write a voice to text for his LLM setup?

Thing is, we can talk faster then most of us can type.

Voice + Programming is slow because of all the special symbols. But voice + vibe coding? The ability to tell your LLM to do tasks, while you focus on other parts of the code, without the need to switch tabs/windows.

What about "change the color green on this element (html page), where my mouse is pointing"... Annoying with keyboard if you need to switch windows, very possible with voice.

And LLMs are very forgiving for mistakes, unlike if you want to voice program where every symbol needs to be accurate.

People do not realize that programming as we know it, is going to change.

	▲	andai 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		>People do not realize that programming as we know it, is going to change. I saw yesterday that I had been approaching software incorrectly. It feels futuristic because it's so fast, but it's still linear. One guy making one thing at a time (with some help from the computer). But software can now be made so rapidly, that the bottleneck is actually curation. You can now generate a hundred ideas for software and a prototype for each one in the time it takes to make some coffee. Going through all of it is the part that doesn't scale, it's bottlenecked by the individual. That's the reward function, right? Taste, discernment. At this point software can grow itself, it can mutate, and it can combine with other software. I think building is entirely the wrong metaphor now. I think a better metaphor would be a genetic algorithm. You try a bunch of stuff and see what works. Then you combine the best parts.
	▲	fragmede 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Wispr flow ftw

▲

luqtas 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

disabled people? also no one needs 105% efficiency all the time when using a computer