This. Sure, it's X% more difficult to do Y in Europe, because Europe doesn't want you to do Y, either at all, or unless you clean up after yourself so the costs aren't just eaten up by the environment or whatever, or unless you do it without causing harm. That's not a problem. That's the system working as intended.

Sure, Europe doesn't have it's own Microsoft, probably because of regulations like this, but I don't want Europe to have its own Microsoft, because Microsoft, for the most part, sucks.

▲

aerhardt 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> That's not a problem. That's the system working as intended.

You really think that supra-national legislators regulating the fine-print of unfathomably complex systems manage to have everything working "as intended"?

Why do Draghi or the EC want to roll back this mess then, other than the evident loss of competitiveness respective of the blocs who did not do this? Was that intended or foreseen?

▲

Telaneo 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> You really think that supra-national legislators regulating the fine-print of unfathomably complex systems manage to have everything working "as intended"?

For values of, yes. Things obviously aren't perfect, but I at-least generally prefer them over their proposed alternatives. I find they have made things better.

> Why do Draghi or the EC want to roll back this mess then, other than the evident loss of competitiveness respective of the blocs who did not do this? Was that intended or foreseen?

From the article:

> Under intense pressure from industry and the US government,

I think that says what needs to be said. And my opinion is that they shouldn't yield to US government and industry interests, since they clearly aren't the same as European interests.

	▲	tick_tock_tick 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I mean Europe doesn't really get to make the choices when it comes to the USA because of their hilarious practice of hamstringing themselves. If that was the goal it definitely worked.

▲

omnimus 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think what they mean is that what EU in general kinda knows that for various they won't be able to make their version of money machine big tech. So why not to try different path? The individual laws will always be flawed because there is huge pressure to make them flawed by corps and lobby that want's to exploit them.

But if you ask anyone in europe on the street they have no sympathy for big tech. If anything they want stronger GDPR and more of it.