| ▲ | Lio 6 hours ago | |
There seems to be the implication that the people taking over are better placed to run things. You have to ask yourself though, if those trying to assume control can't get together and sell the idea of a new fork to the userbase why would they be the best people to successfully run the original project? | ||
| ▲ | gwbas1c 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I suggest reading this statement more carefully: > These simply can't be forked without broad consensus around which fork to follow. Thus: > if those trying to assume control can't get together and sell the idea of a new fork to the userbase why would they be the best people to successfully run the original project? That's exactly what I mean by "broad consensus." | ||
| ▲ | pseudalopex 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> You have to ask yourself though, if those trying to assume control can't get together and sell the idea of a new fork to the userbase why would they be the best people to successfully run the original project? Assume control is a loaded phrase. And many people believe a fork should be a last resort. | ||