Nah, the solution is deanonymization.

People with no shame, and with strong anti-social tendencies should not be given a safe space.

Facebook has a real name policy and is a prime example of internet-fueled insanity. Why does deanonymization not help Facebook be a more positive place?

Does that also apply to people living under oppressive governments? Anonymity can be a useful tool for sharing information that those in power don't want released, for example whistle blowing.

You said it brother!

We should make everyone who disagrees with baxuz where name tags on their chest in the real world too. So we can know who they are.

We can even put the names on a bright yellow six sided star. That way everyone can see them clearly.

If anyone should be given a safe space, then everyone should be given a safe space.

So that people with no shame, and with strong anti-social tendencies who are in power can come back at the de-anonymized people. Yeah, thanks.

A woman wearing anything but a burqa in an extremist Islamic society would be popularly categorized as one of the "people with no shame, and with strong anti-social tendencies". So according to you liberal women in Iran, Pakistan, Sudan etc should not be given a safe space, is it?

[flagged]