| ▲ | mikece 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
How about this as a privacy law: if you collect data about people without their EXPLICIT permission[1] you can be charged with digital stalking. Same principle as stalking; escalating penalties for repeat offenses and for doing so in bulk or en masse. EDIT: And you cannot share information gained by permitted collection unless EXPLICIT permission to share is granted. [1] Eg: it's not sufficient to disclose this in equivocal text buried in 25k lines of EULA text. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kragen 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Your proposed law would mostly be used against people who were publicizing the criminal record of the mayor's nominee for police chief or the ruling party's nominee for mayor. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Aloisius 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What constitutes data about people? If I save your comment, am I a digital stalker? Is Google a digital stalker because they archived this page? Is HN a digital stalker because they didn't get your explicit permission to show a profile page with your karma on it? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||