| ▲ | gassi 9 hours ago | |||||||
I run a semi-popular open source project (https://romm.app/), and this is a topic we tend to revisit regularly. While there will always have to be someone at the top who owns the project, we've tried to organize ourselves in a way that should prevent a complete hostile takeover:
In the event either (or both) of us step away, temporarily or permanently, the core team is has the power and permissions to continue running the project indefinitely. While I would be able to remove them as co-owner on Github in a takeover scenario, I won't have access to the finances or the Discord community. | ||||||||
| ▲ | graemep 9 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> Name and branding are owned by The Project itself That is only meaningful if the project is a legal entity that can sue, otherwise it means "no one owns it" - which is fine if that is what you want. | ||||||||
| ||||||||