| ▲ | lukan 2 hours ago | |
"Maybe a nitpick but the point is that a NN created to be good at trading is likely to outperform LLMs at this task the same way way NNs created specifically to be good at board games vastly outperform LLMs at those games." Disagree. Go and chess are games with very limited rules. Succesful trading on the other hand is not so much a arbitary numbers game, but involves analyzing events in the news happening right now. Agentic LLMs that do this and accordingly buy and sell might succeed here. (Not what they did here, though "For the first season, they are not given news or access to the leading “narratives” of the market.") | ||