| ▲ | ezekiel68 3 hours ago | |||||||
You don't actually need nanosecond latency to trade effectively in futures markets but it does help to be able to evaluate and make decisions in the single-digit milliseconds range. Almost no generative model is able to perform inference at this latency threshold. A threshold in the single-digit milliseconds range allows the rapid detection of price reversals (signaling the need to exit a position with least loss) in even the most liquid of real futures contracts (not counting rare "flash crash" events). | ||||||||
| ▲ | graemep 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
From the article: > The models engage in mid-to-low frequency trading (MLFT) trading, where decisions are spaced by minutes to a few hours, not microseconds. In stark contrast to high-frequency trading, MLFT gets us closer to the question we care about: can a model make good choices with a reasonable amount of time and information? | ||||||||
| ▲ | vita7777777 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
This is true for some classes of strategies. At the same time there are strategies that can be profitable on longer timeframes. The two worlds are not mutually exclusive. | ||||||||
| ||||||||