|
| ▲ | issafram 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I'm surprised at the other responses that you have received. RCS isn't a Google only thing. And it isn't an "app". It is disappointing that people don't understand that RCS is a great replacement for SMS/MMS. |
| |
| ▲ | TavsiE9s 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It really isn't. SMS did not support adding random mobile numbers to a group chat and blasting them with spam. Someone needs to either fix RCS properly for current day use-cases or it just needs to go away. | |
| ▲ | piva00 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It had the potential to be a great replacement if it just worked™ like SMS/MMS (well, MMS was also quite fickle back in the days), given it's so brittle across devices even on the same OS, with little means of troubleshooting by end-users and even less from non-tech savvy users, it's kinda dead in the water. |
|
|
| ▲ | throwawaysoxjje 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah I took a look at it: Google added the encryption extensions a full two years before the GSMA put them into the standard so it feels like their new chat app. Not to mention that it’s been around since 2007 and everyone started tailing about it when google started talking about it a couple years ago |
|
| ▲ | ocdtrekkie 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's Google's way to openwash their new chat app into a "standard" where 100% of the data runs through their servers in the backend for every carrier they care about. |
|
| ▲ | happymellon 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes it is. No one gave a crap about RCS and no one was supporting it until Google decided that they needed a new chat app because they hadn't made everyone switch in a while. |
