According to the census bureau median family income in 1960 was $5,600, which is $58,946.59 in Jan 2024 dollars. It's $83,730 in 2024.

For individual males, in 1960 it was $4,100 ($43,157.33 Jan 2024 dollars) and $71,090 in 2024.

Sources:

https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1962/demo/p60-03...

https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2025/demo/p60-28...

https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl

The thing is, a 1960s standard of living would be totally unacceptable by almost everyone today. Single car max, no air conditioning, small house or apartment, multiple children sharing bedrooms, no cellphones, no Internet, no cable, no streaming. Local calls only. Children allowed outside by themselves.

▲

byryan 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think you're out of touch with what "almost everyone" considers an acceptable standard of living. I know plenty of people who have a single car or none at all, live in apartments living pay check to pay check with no kids at all because they are afraid they can't afford them. They would love to have what you described, minus the no cell phones/internet.

▲

Terr_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I feel there is something unsound with that comparison, because you could also apply it to kings of history, simply by listing things that technologically unavailable or unaffordable.

Imagine transmigrating King Louis XVI (pre-revolution) into some working class professional with a refrigerator, a car, cable TV, etc. I don't think it's a given that he'd consider the package an upgrade.

▲

zeroonetwothree 2 hours ago | parent [-]

“Pre-revolution” is doing a lot of work in that sentence

	▲	Terr_ an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The point is to compare the daily life the monarch would have considered "normal." "Pre-revolution" is just to preempt any "Hurr hurr he'd be ecstatic not to have his head chopped off LOL." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_Louis_XVI

▲

ethanwillis 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

now tell us how they calculate those inflation adjusted dollars-- what basket of goods? prices in which markets?

▲

tharne 4 hours ago | parent [-]

They've cited and linked their sources. What's the issue?

	▲	ethanwillis 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The "issue" is the comparison is much more complex than people may be led to believe. It's not a simple "adjust the dollars to be the same" calculation. There are a lot of assumptions that go into making that calculation. If I tell you that the value of a dollar you hold has gone down or up this year versus last year because of the price fluctuation of an item you never have or never will purchase, such as hermit crabs in New Zealand. Would you believe your dollar is worth more or less? What if the price of a good you do spend your dollars on has an inverse relationship with the price of hermit crabs in New Zealand? Or what if the prices of the items you do buy haven't moved at all?
	▲	bpt3 an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The issue is that it doesn't support his preconceived notion that everyone is doing terribly.