| ▲ | matt-p 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Why do you need ipv6 on your internal network? Is 10/8 really not enough/overlap? For 99.99% of people it's fine for the internal interfaces and if anything actually simplifies configuration. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fulafel 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For a lot of use cases a major advantage of IPv6 is to get away from ambiguous rfc1918 addressing. You can then just put an allow rule between arbitrary v6 addresses anywhere on the internet when you need connectivity without any other hacks like proxies, NAT, etc and the associated complexity and addressing ambiguity/context dependence of rfc1918 addresses. So fex you can just curl or ssh to your mycontainer.mydomain.net or you can put an allow rule from mycontainer.mydomain.net to a vm or laptop on your home network. Internetworking, they call it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | yrro 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The purpose of a network is to allow any two consenting parties to communicate. IPv4 cannot deliver that if either party has an RFC1918 address. NAT is a foul perversion of this foundational principle of the Internet Protocol. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mulmen an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The benefit of IPv6 is that I don’t need an internal network at all. Everything is on the Internet and the firewall is the only thing that gets in the way. | |||||||||||||||||||||||