The only intellectual property here would be trademark. No copyright, no patent, no trade secret. Unless someone wants to market the test results as a genuine Pac-Man-branded product, or otherwise dilute that brand, there's nothing should-y about it.

▲

bongodongobob 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not an ethics thing. It's a guardrails thing.

	▲	sowbug 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's a valid point, though an average LLM would certainly understand the difference between trademark and other forms of IP. I was responding to the earlier comment, whose author later clarified that it represented an ethical stance ("stealing the hard work of some honest, human souls").