| I don't see why. You can always subscribe to a newspaper. Or just use RSS and a subscription tool since it didn't just go away. What I'm saying, though, is if you don't use social media at this point you're already an outlier (I am, it should be noted, using the term broadly: you are using social media. Right now. Hacker News is in the same category as Facebook, Twitter, Mastodon, et. al. in this context: it's a place you go to get information instead of using a collection of RSS feeds, and I think the reason people do this instead of that may be instructive as to the ultimate fate of RSS for that use-case). |
| |
| ▲ | basscomm 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > You can always subscribe to a newspaper. The circulation for my local newspaper is so small that they now get printed at a press a hundred miles away and are shipped in every morning to the handful of subscribers who are left. I don't even know the last time I saw a physical newspaper in person. > Hacker News... it's a place you go to get information instead of using a collection of RSS feeds No, it's a place I go to _in addition_ to RSS feeds. An anonymous news aggregator with web forum attached isn't really social media. Maybe some people hang out here to socialize, but that's not a use case for me | | |
| ▲ | shadowgovt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The relevant use case is you come here to see links people share and comment on them. That's sufficiently "social" in this context. Contrasting the other use case you dabble in (that makes you an outlier) of pulling content from specific sources (I'm going to assume generating original content, not themselves link aggregators, otherwise this topic is moot) via RSS. Most people see that as redundant if they have access to something like HN, or Fark, or Reddit, or Facebook. RSS readers alone, in general, don't let you share your thoughts with other people reading the article, so it's not as popular a tool. | | |
| ▲ | basscomm an hour ago | parent [-] | | > The relevant use case is you come here to see links people share and comment on them. That's sufficiently "social" in this context. Just having users submit links that other users can comment on doesn't make it social media. I can't follow particular users or topics, I can't leave myself a note about some user that I've had a positive or negative experience with, I can't ignore someone who I don't want to read, etc. Heck, usernames are so de-emphasized on this site that I almost always forget that they're there. | | |
| ▲ | shadowgovt 43 minutes ago | parent [-] | | A rose by any other name. If you'd prefer I'd have said "But for keeping up to date on news, people use link aggregation boards where other users post links to stuff on the web and then talk to each other about them. RSS isn't the missing piece of the puzzle for changing that, an app on top of RSS is. And in the absence of Reader, nothing has shown up to fill that role that can compete with just trading gossip on Hacker News." ... that would be the same point. RSS, by itself, is a protocol for finding out some site created new content and is just not particularly compelling by itself for the average user when they can use "link aggregation boards where other users post links to stuff on the web and then talk to each othe about them" instead. | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | righthand 10 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > since it didn't just go away. But do you see how removing a feature from a major browser makes it seem like RSS did just go away and how RSS will eventually go away? What a terrible disingenuous argument. Anyone not in line with big tech deserves to be pushed aside eh? |
|
