I'd also throw Erlang/Elixir out there. And I really wished Elm wasn't such a trainwreck of a project...

59nadir 11 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

No need to include Elixir here; none of the important bits that will change how you view software come from Elixir, it's just a skin on top of Erlang (+ some standard library wrappers) and that's it.

	▲	zwnow 3 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'd argue more people use Elixir over Erlang at this point. Sure its just an abstraction on top of Erlang, but people learn through Elixir nowadays, not through Erlang.

▲

matu3ba 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What is the most optimal Erlang/Elixir you can think of regarding standardized effect systems for recording non-determinism, replaying and reversible computing? How comparable are performance numbers of Erlang/Elixir with Java and wasm?

	▲	zwnow 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'd recommend asking the Elixir community about this as I didn't even understand your question. I am by no means a professional with Erlang/Elixir. I threw it out there because these language force you to think differently compared to common OOP languages.