| ▲ | xethos 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> They introduced some BLE features before the spec was finished In their defence, they went with Lightning shortly before the USB-C spec was finalized. Then, to avoid their customers being screwed over by constantly changing the connector, they kind of had to stick with it for a decade. People will complain if they push features that are ahead of the spec, and they'll complain if they let the spec be finalized before they use it. Being guided by "What's the best we can do for UX, assuming out users are our users in every product category we enter" seems to be their reasonable middle ground. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | vee-kay 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The only reason Apple ditched Lightning port and finally gave USB-C port in the iDevices, is because EU forced Apple to do so. But do you think your oh-so-common USB-C cables will work with a new iPhone? In my country (India), Apple still doesn't sell charger and cable along with its new iDevices, even though those gadgets are exorbitantly expensive. And Apple doesn't allow custom repair here, even though my country mandated the Right to Repair, like EU did so. My old Mac Mini 2012 is gathering dust in a cupboard, because Apple service center refused to upgrade it to new RAM and new SATA SSD, citing Apple policies. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | binkHN 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If Apple wasn't forced by the EU, they would try to preserve their walled garden as much as possible. iMessage is the prime example of this. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bmandale 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
both scenarios speak to either an incredible impatience, or deliberate incompatibility to tie people to their ecosystem. | |||||||||||||||||