I don't think any country has the right to demand that another country hands over enriched uranium and allow them to move into a shipyard so that they could build a nuclear sub. Of course you need permission from a seller to buy products and use their facilities. I would recommend going beyond simply reading the headline.

▲

hearsathought 14 hours ago | parent [-]

> I don't think any country has the right to demand that another country hands over enriched uranium and allow them to move into a shipyard so that they could build a nuclear sub.

The US won't allow south korea to enrich uranium on their own. Want to try again?

> I would recommend going beyond simply reading the headline.

Another intentional distracting comment.

▲

jtuple 14 hours ago | parent [-]

> The US won't allow south korea to enrich uranium on their own. Want to try again?

190 nations have signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty. This includes China, so the very US vs China premise here is misplaced.

[The US, UK, France, Russia, China and 185 other countries] won't allow south korea to enrich uranium on their own

▲

hearsathought 14 hours ago | parent [-]

> 190 nations have signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Who cares?

> This includes China, so the very US vs China premise here is misplaced.

Sure. But it wasn't china that stopped korea's and japan's secret nuclear programs. It was the US.

> [The US, UK, France, Russia, China and 185 other countries] won't allow south korea to enrich uranium on their own

Just like they prevented north korea...

Your response debunks your response. It's quite remarkable actually.

The only country that can prevent another country is the one militarily occupying it. China, France, Russia, UK and the other 185 countries don't militarily occupy south korea. The only reason north korea, israel, india, pakistan, etc were able to go nuclear is because they are not vassal states military occupied by a foreign power.

▲

JumpCrisscross 13 hours ago | parent [-]

> Who cares?

You don't understand why South Korea might care about nuclear proliferation?

	▲	hearsathought 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If india doesn't care, why should south korea? India only has 2 nuclear powers surrounding it. South korea has 4. Why should korea care more than india? I'd love to hear your thoughts as an indian on this matter. You are my goto indian guru on all matters geopolitics, politics, economics, tech, sports ( cricket, not baseball for obvious reasons ), etc. I await enlightenment.