Not sure yet, curious to reflect on it more.

But initial take is that some environments people trust each other more. Trusting intentions, actions, words, ability. For example, a low-trust environment would probably be most prisons. High-trust might be a neighborhood where people don't lock their doors.

I remember reading a World Bank economist saying that we might be able to explain the difference in GDP per capita between the US and a place like Somalia based on how much people trust each other. How mistrust can add so much friction to interactions.

▲

CGMthrowaway 9 hours ago | parent [-]

There's a lot of research in this area. You might not like the conclusions.

Fukuyama (Trust) or Putnam (Bowling Alone) might be a good place to start, or here is a public paper by Putnam: https://www.puttingourdifferencestowork.com/pdf/j.1467-9477....

Here's another prominent paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00472...

Uslaner (2002) makes a distinction between moralistic trust ("Can people be trusted?") and strategic trust ("Can THIS person be trusted?") that you may find interesting.

There is also Yamagashi's Paradox: Japanese cooperate more, but trust less. Americans trust more, but defect more in specific situations.

▲

jimkleiber 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I am very very fascinated by these leads. Thank you so much for sharing them, and excited to hear about any more that you may have.

	▲	jimkleiber 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"Collectivist societies promote security, but at the same time destroy trust" Yes, very fascinated. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-4-431-53936-0