| ▲ | SilverElfin 11 hours ago | |||||||
Agree. Focusing on the inequality bit feels closer to envy. But if the quality of life or something like inflation adjusted wealth is going up for everyone, or if it is above some acceptable minimum, then is it really a problem? Or just a reflection of how concentrated things can be in a technologically advanced world? | ||||||||
| ▲ | kuerbel 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I’m from Europe, and that’s what I focus on when talking about inequality: even if everyone’s living standards are rising, extreme wealth concentration can erode social cohesion, limit access to essential services, and distort political influence. You seem to view this through an American lens, very focused on individual opportunity, while to me it's about fairness, shared responsibility, and the health of society. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | TFYS 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Is criticizing dictatorships just envy? Because wealth inequality is the same thing as power inequality. Wealth doesn't just mean more goods to consume, it means power, and that power is mostly used to gain even more wealth and power. Eventually we'll have power concentration similar to a real dictatorship. Opposing such a future is not envy. | ||||||||
| ▲ | computerthings 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[dead] | ||||||||