IPv6 uses the exact same 8-bit codes as IPv4.

It uses them a little differently -- in IPv4, there is one protocol per packet, while in IPv6, "protocols" can be chained in a mechanism called extension headers -- but this actually makes the problem of number exhaustion more acute.

▲

brewmarche 15 hours ago | parent [-]

What if extension headers made it better? We could come up with a protocol consisting solely of a larger Next Header field and chain this pseudo header with the actual payload whenever the protocol number is > 255. The same idea could also be used in IPv4.

▲

kbolino 14 hours ago | parent [-]

I didn't mean to imply otherwise. But, as you say, this is equally applicable to IPv4 and IPv6. There were a lot of issues solved by IPv6, but "have even more room for non-TCP/UDP transports" wasn't one of them (and didn't need to be, tbqh).

	▲	brewmarche 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I agree, although I am a bit surprised to see that we’ve used more than half of the protocol numbers already