It’s grimly hilarious that anyone in 2025 believes the police wouldn’t do something because that thing is unethical and against their own standards.

> handle CSAM

They wouldn’t “handle” it, they’d have some third party do their dirty work.

Andrew Bustamante has stated that the CIA "supplies" people with such material.

https://youtu.be/fu6bYPTp_kE?si=K_YKzTxy5ggKQDiG&t=2156

> They wouldn’t “handle” it, they’d have some third party do their dirty work.

Without proof, that's just an edgelord conspiracy theory.

Police are not the Borg, perfectly coordinated in their evilness, all law enforcement agencies have internal power structures and strife, rivalries, jealousy, old conflicts. The fact that some action, such as planting evidence leading to a conviction, is punishable with long prison sentences, is not something the corrupt can simply afford to ignore, while giving their internal foes mortal leverage against them.

For example, if Kash Patel receives an order from his handlers to plant child porn on some political target, that outcome might happen or not, but what you can be pretty damn sure is that all those involved will be aware of the risks and will try their best to stay out of it, or, if coerced, do it covertly so as to minimize the extreme risks they face.

The point was not that FBI are a bunch of angels, but that the undeniable risks involved by such a move seem completely unnecessary - the FBI has for years been weaponized against overseas copyright infringers, openly and legally.