I don't know anything about Adguard, but good on the team for doing the extra digging instead of just going along with the claim. Even better that they're sharing what they've found with everyone else.

▲

econ 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Their DNS is great. Removing websites without a good reason would quickly ruin everything for them.

▲

dizhn 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Their pihole alternative is great too. Single go binary. Fantastic software.

▲

abnercoimbre 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not well-versed in this: is AdGuard roughly equivalent to Pi-hole?

	▲	GeekyBear 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They do run a public DNS server that is equivalent to a Pihole. It's worth trying on devices where you can't install ad blocking software, but can change the TCP/IP settings.
	▲	danek_szy 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Their self-hosted product (AdGuard Home) is. ;)
	▲	nasduia 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		yes, and it will happily run on a reasonable OpenWRT system such as a GL.iNet Flint 2.

▲

workfromspace 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

How would they compare to NextDNS?

▲

hirako2000 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes kudo. The pressure could simply be inferred as due to the arrogant trend one can observe, the editing of history.

▲

like_any_other 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> doing the extra digging instead of just going along with the claim.

That's the intention of intermediary liability laws - to make meritless censorship be the easy, no-risk way out. To deputize corporations to act as police under a guilty-until-proven-innocent framework.

▲

diebillionaires 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

yes, major respect to adguard.

▲

9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]