| ▲ | foo-bar-bat 3 days ago | |||||||
Raccoons have been living literally inside of houses for centuries. One was kept as a pet in Jamestown Virginia in the 1600s. Another lived in the White House in the 1900s. Surely, not a decade has passed between have there been NO domesticated raccoons in the US? If living near humans changes animals, that started at least 25,000 years ago here in North America. Not recently. My neighbors had a pet raccoon growing up. It lived inside but would come and go. The people who wrote this article seem out of touch with the topic they chose to pretend to be experts about? | ||||||||
| ▲ | lokar 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Did it say otherwise? It primarily says they can now observe physical changes associated with domestication. Also, keeping a wild animal as a pet does not domesticate it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | tharne 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> The people who wrote this article seem out of touch with the topic they chose to pretend to be experts about? This is quickly becoming the norm for experts, unfortunately. I keep seeing more an more people with educational expertise in something that they have zero hands-on or practical experience with. I remember being at a social event once and chatting with someone who was a business professor at any Ivy League university. Making small talk, I asked him which companies he'd worked at, and he told me that he had gone the academic track and started teaching during and after getting his PhD (in exactly what I don't remember). I remember being stunned that students would pay over $60k a year to learn about business from someone who'd never worked for or started a business. | ||||||||
| ||||||||