Remix.run Logo
mulmen 6 hours ago

> But, if we stopped minting pennies because they cost too much (3.7 cents), it's hard to imagine we're going to keep producing nickels when they cost 13.8 cents to mint. Dimes are much cheaper than nickels (5.8 cents), and quarters aren't too bad relative to face value (14.7 cents).

Coins aren’t disposable. Why does it matter if the production cost is higher than the face value?

axiolite an hour ago | parent [-]

> Why does it matter if the production cost is higher than the face value?

You can buy pennies or nickels in bulk, melt them down, and turn a tidy profit. That's literally a "money printing glitch"

Every penny or nickel that gets lost in the gutter, stored in a coin collection, used as a washer or shim, turned into jewelery, or sets around in jars unused, represents a financial loss to the Treasury.

It's called seigniorage and melt value. Also see Gresham's law (hoarding).

mulmen an hour ago | parent [-]

No, you can't. According to [1] the scrap value of a penny is $0.0084771. The cost of production is $0.037. The relevant question is if a penny creates more than $0.037 of economic value before it is lost or destroyed.

[1]: http://coinapps.com/base-metal/coin/calculator/

axiolite 15 minutes ago | parent [-]

Okay, metal prices are low at the moment, but post-1982 pennies did have a melt value of approx 2c not long ago. And it shows nickels are still currently worth more than 5c.

mulmen 2 minutes ago | parent [-]

[delayed]